[classyfast]

Originally Posted by gatorfast

We can't believe you're sitting here on this forum either. Don't let the door hit you on the way out.

Oh okay buddy.....solid comment there

[AlexFL]

Originally Posted by classyfast

Oh okay buddy.....solid comment there

Please understand. By claiming that BMW and Merc do not make good SUVs you lost all the credibility. It is clear that you are here to troll.

[mjrennie]

Originally Posted by AlexFL

Please understand. By claiming that BMW and Merc do not make good SUVs you lost all the credibility. It is clear that you are here to troll.

Agreed. He makes no sense.

[XsltAnalyst]

BMW catches up to Merc since it has more optimal gearing at high speeds.

Ideally it would be awesome if BMW put V8 in X3. That would be bonkers

[am3r1ka]

Originally Posted by XsltAnalyst

BMW catches up to Merc since it has more optimal gearing at high speeds.

Ideally it would be awesome if BMW put V8 in X3. That would be bonkers

Might come off as blasphemy, but if they took a page out of Merc's book and implemented an electric motor to account for the turbo lag from start off…that'll be bonkers

[Wills2]

Originally Posted by am3r1ka

Might come off as blasphemy, but if they took a page out of Merc's book and implemented an electric motor to account for the turbo lag from start off…that'll be bonkers

You mean boost threshold, lag is a different thing.

[AlexFL]

Originally Posted by Wills2

You mean boost threshold, lag is a different thing.

He means mild hybrid to improve the low end torque. Like the new GLE.

[Wills2]

Originally Posted by AlexFL

He means mild hybrid to improve the low end torque. Like the new GLE.

Yes which fills in until the turbo gets to its boost threshold....lag is different which was the point.

[csh212]

Originally Posted by classyfast

I can't believe I'm sitting here on this forum looking at a video and thread of 2 SAV's going head to head regarding performance and that's actually a thing (let alone a desirable thing)! I guess that's the market today.

2 ugly truck-cars from company's that realistically don't make good truck-car/suv/sav's.....never understood it.

Trollin with the top down.

[FSociety]

We are testing Beta Tune OTS STG1 on a X3M (non-Comp) with OEM tires, full tank

Beta STG1 93
0-60 3.18s -0.42% slope dragy
1/4 mile 11.14@123.78mph +0.10% slope

Beta STG1 E30
0-60 2.96s 0% slope, 2.77s with 1 ft roll-out
1/4 mile: 10.90@127.05 -0.8% slope spinning bad 1.74s 60ft'

Update/Correction not stock

[AlexFL]

Originally Posted by FSociety

We just tested a X3M (non-Comp) with OEM tires, full tank

0-60 3.18s
1/4 mile 11.14@123.78mph

Stock X3M? impossible!

[MrItaly]

Originally Posted by FSociety

We just tested a X3M (non-Comp) with OEM tires, full tank

0-60 3.18s
1/4 mile 11.14@123.78mph

Downhill?

[ParadigmDawg]

Originally Posted by FSociety

We are testing Beta Tune OTS STG1 on a X3M (non-Comp) with OEM tires, full tank

Beta STG1 93
0-60 3.18s -0.42% slope dragy
1/4 mile 11.14@123.78mph +0.10% slope

Beta STG1 E30
0-60 2.96s 0% slope, 2.77s with 1 ft roll-out
1/4 mile: 10.90@127.05 -0.8% slope spinning bad 1.74s 60ft'

Update/Correction not stock

...and yet, zero proof with data....

[Sam@BimmerClinic]

Originally Posted by ParadigmDawg

...and yet, zero proof with data....

Check out PTF's facebook:

" S58 - OTS Stage 1 beta map results on this 2020 X3M. Gains are awesome and show some really amazing potential on this new platform! Thank you to @aimperformancenj for having fun with us testing out #bootmod3 software👊👊+100whp on just a reflash on pump 93 octane so far, +120whp on E30, 2.96 0-60mph time with 0 slope on @dragy_motorsports GPS device"

[FSociety]

Originally Posted by ParadigmDawg

...and yet, zero proof with data....

-

[Circuit Hunter]

Originally Posted by ParadigmDawg

The GLC is just too high in the back which kills it's looks. Once you lower it and even it out it looks really good.

This is mine lowered.

Best looking ride on this forum.