[elkid23]

I love look/lines of the X3 M, however I have a tough time getting over the fact that the fenders/width of the vehicle looks so similar to a standard X3. Does anyone else feel the same way?

Maybe it's just me, as my favorite part of my F80 was wide fenders/aggressive stance. Thanks!

[redcrxsi]

Yep pretty much everyone feels the same way

It would appear the M division is going away from different body panels. I believe the latest g80 camo pics and renders show little of any fender flare. Time will tell for sure though.

[SWOT1]

Agree, but even more disappointed that they didn't offer a wider wheel/tire combo! 265/255 is not acceptable for an M vehicle, certainly not the Competition! Fortunately, a relatively painless tire upgrade (and spacers if desired) makes a big difference IMO!

(295/35/21r - 265/40/21f is the way to go!)

*no spacers in these pics, but 12mm all around coming soon.

[to_riffic]

I'm definitely in the minority. Doesn't bother me. I'm cognizant as a rider that having to slip my way through traffic with massive SUV's and trucks that it's good enough. We already barely get enough room to split lanes on the freeway and adding more girth just adds to the lack of awareness of the regular driver...

[new2the3]

Yes, one is the distinguishing features of an M car is unique body panels, that is part of the premium we pay. X3M got the short end of the stick with the same hood and fenders as the regular x3, but bmw charged the full M premium.

[AlexFL]

Here is Hamann’s wide body kit for the regular X4 - it already looks more aggressive than X4M. Let’s hope they come up with wide body panels for X3 M.

[SWOT1]

Originally Posted by AlexFL

Here is Hamann’s wide body kit for the regular X4 - it already looks more aggressive than X4M. Let’s hope they come up with wide body panels for X3 M.

Now this is a proper setup!!

(those 22's look great)

[CroztheBoz]

None of the X5/6 M models have had wider arches, either.

[heavyD^2]

At the end of the day it's really just a fast SUV that will rarely ever see track or off road duty. If I wanted a vehicle with a aggressive, low stance I would have got a car. I do agree it would have been nice to have a little wider rubber but I don't really look at this car with lust like I did to sporty cars I've owned in the past. It's an SUV after all and I got it for its utility.

[elkid23]

Originally Posted by new2the3

Yes, one is the distinguishing features of an M car is unique body panels, that is part of the premium we pay. X3M got the short end of the stick with the same hood and fenders as the regular x3, but bmw charged the full M premium.

I didn't even realize the hood was the same! That was my 2nd favorite part of the F80 Kidding, but really!

Is the hood and fender likeness the same for all "X M" models going forward? I'm looking on BMW site and the X3, X4, X5 and X6 M's all look to have standard body panels/hoods. I could be wrong though.

[elkid23]

Originally Posted by heavyD^2

At the end of the day it's really just a fast SUV that will rarely ever see track or off road duty. If I wanted a vehicle with a aggressive, low stance I would have got a car. I do agree it would have been nice to have a little wider rubber but I don't really look at this car like I did to sporty cars I've owned in the past. It's an SUV after all.

Interesting POV. I disagree, just because I don't necessarily relate track time to the look of the car. I actually think of them as disparate, and would rather have the aggressive look with less performance for the track.

To each his/her own

[SWOT1]

At the very least, I'd love for BMW to offer the COMPETITION models with a more aggressive stance (both fenders and wheels/rim), even as an option.... I'd best most would pay a premium for a wide(r) body look and larger wheels.

(I suppose the aftermarket companies are perfectly fine with the status quo)

[M2CLBB437M]

Bought mine specifically because it looks like a run of the mill nondescript appliance. Debadged it and never washed. Blends into the background. And love that the tyres are set up agility, not looks.

[Miko M]

Originally Posted by AlexFL

Here is Hamann’s wide body kit for the regular X4 - it already looks more aggressive than X4M. Let’s hope they come up with wide body panels for X3 M.

I know someone that is making similar fender flares here in US
Can't share the pictures but it will be released soon
I will probably get a set, this car needs wider tires badly

[sayemthree]

Originally Posted by to_riffic

I'm definitely in the minority. Doesn't bother me. I'm cognizant as a rider that having to slip my way through traffic with massive SUV's and trucks that it's good enough. We already barely get enough room to split lanes on the freeway and adding more girth just adds to the lack of awareness of the regular driver...

I tend to agree I wouldn’t want it any bigger

[itsmabs]

I'm fine with the tire setup, I wouldn't of minded a slight change to the body lines or hood. But I'm also pretty ok with it blending in.

[gatorfast]

M cars have always come with relatively narrow tires. Especially with awd, traction becomes much less of an issue whereby wider tires aren't needed. Seems like most people on here who have gone with wider tires have done so solely for looks and not because the original sizes were providing insufficient traction.

[AlexFL]

Originally Posted by gatorfast

M cars have always come with relatively narrow tires. Especially with awd, traction becomes much less of an issue whereby wider tires aren't needed. Seems like most people on here who have gone with wider tires have done so solely for looks and not because the original sizes were providing insufficient traction.

When you add performance tunes, grip becomes the limiting factor. Especially wider rear tires really help.

[Miko M]

Originally Posted by AlexFL

When you add performance tunes, grip becomes the limiting factor. Especially rear wider tires really help.

That for sure mine tuned F90 M5 was spinning all 4 at launch

[SWOT1]

Originally Posted by gatorfast

M cars have always come with relatively narrow tires. Especially with awd, traction becomes much less of an issue whereby wider tires aren't needed. Seems like most people on here who have gone with wider tires have done so solely for looks and not because the original sizes were providing insufficient traction.

Gator, for reference, the X5M comes with 295f/315r! (even the M40i has 275 rears!)

[redcrxsi]

Originally Posted by SWOT1

Gator, for reference, the X5M comes with 295f/315r! (even the M40i has 275 rears!)

This gets pointed out a lot but the M40i also has only 9.5in rear wheels so it’s not actually wider.

[SWOT1]

Originally Posted by redcrxsi

This gets pointed out a lot but the M40i also has only 9.5in rear wheels so it’s not actually wider.

Yup. The X3MC should have a 10.5" rear option with 295's.