08-01-2019, 04:20 AM | #155 |
Major General
13347
Rep 7,484
Posts |
I think one of the issues is manufactures saying rubbish like the gearbox is filled for life. Life being defined as 100k miles. The warranty takes you up to 60k / 3 years on some and after that the not-mentioned maintenance starts. May be it is a sales thing. Getting people into newer models and profit margins. So when the support ends at 60k miles the panic has already been created. One of things BMW don't do is the high mileage club like Mercedes. For keeping your Mercedes 100k miles and more you receive a badge / mini medal and certificate for your documents. In fact Mercedes are so confident many of their models can make it to starship mileages why don't BMW hold the same confidence?
Financial gurus offering advice on how a car cost more the older it gets. We live in a fast paced world where some people don't know how to slow down. Even maintaining a car seems like an effort to some so they opt for a service package. I came from a generation where cars were passed down. I had two uncles working in Ford. One uncle even went on to work on buses and heavy haulage equipment. Whenever we would go to see my uncle he would be under his car. Tinkering with it or maintaining it. He taught his son maintenance and how to change oil. Not every man is hands on. I saw my dad change taps on a sink once and fit fog lights to his car. Beyond that I never bonded with him over cars yet I became a car guy somehow. We bonded over computers as that was his thing. I built my own PC at age 14. All my cousins were spending $$$$ on things such as the Gateway 2000 or whatever the latest model was. My $150 one made of parts from different computers destroyed theirs. I digress but you get the picture it depends on childhood influences and values. My dad kept his car 10 years+ and every car until it died or couldn't be repaired. If the repair was worth more than the car he didn't have it fixed by his brother. I learned the value of things and kept my cars longer until I met my wife. I wouldn't say she is materialistic but she thought I could do better. She encouraged me to get my first BMW. It was a ball ache to maintain but for some reason I fell in love with it and wonder who is driving it now. When it wasn't worth repairing I moved on to my next BMW. My reason for change being to save money. I think manufacturers have also made it difficult to DIY. They want you to go to the service department. Making specialist tools or inside knowledge of things they can only fix. This is probably another thing that puts people off. May be it is too complex, costly or time consuming to learn about new things. I think I am rambling on here so will stop here. |
08-01-2019, 06:02 AM | #156 | |
Captain
604
Rep 631
Posts |
Quote:
I would love to get an M3 (looking for a ZCP now) but owning that outside of a warranty long term and worrying about stuff like the DCT, water to air intercooling system, VANOS, and all the other numerous computers that control every aspect of the car......I'm out of my depth with all of that. It's also expensive as hell to pay people to do it for you. So the logical solution (aside from just not buying it in the first place, which isn't gonna happen haha) is to sell it and move on to something else with a warranty. Times change *shrug* Last edited by EricVR4; 08-01-2019 at 11:51 AM.. |
|
Appreciate
1
Soul_Glo13347.00 |
08-01-2019, 07:42 AM | #157 | |
Major
1803
Rep 1,011
Posts |
Quote:
I had to eat some negative equity on it as once my mechanic confirmed what I was hearing, I was not willing to drive it any further than to the Mazda dealer to trade it in on a lightly used Mazda 3 (1 mile down the road). Between the negative equity, cost of registering the new vehicle (thank you Oklahoma for adding a sales tax on top of the excise tax when registering a vehicle).........wasn't that far off the 5 year 100k mile drivetrain warranty I could have got when I purchased the car last year. So I'd still have the 135, with a fresh engine. |
|
Appreciate
1
EricVR4603.50 |
08-01-2019, 08:34 AM | #158 |
Captain
767
Rep 904
Posts |
Yeah, there seems to be an inverse relationship between cars becoming more capable vs. fun to actually drive. In the Porsche forums, I’d often see the advice to potential buyers, “Buy the newest one you can afford,” but I’d wonder if the better advice would be “Buy the oldest one you can afford to keep on the road.”
That being said, while I complain about current BMWs and Porsches vs. the ones I’ve owned from last decade, there are owners of BMWs and Porsches from 50 years ago that snicker. |
Appreciate
0
|
08-01-2019, 08:37 AM | #159 | ||
Colonel
4975
Rep 2,268
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
don't read this. too late...
|
||
Appreciate
0
|
08-01-2019, 08:39 AM | #160 | |
Colonel
4975
Rep 2,268
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
don't read this. too late...
|
|
Appreciate
1
Soul_Glo13347.00 |
08-01-2019, 08:40 AM | #161 | |
Colonel
4975
Rep 2,268
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
don't read this. too late...
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-01-2019, 08:52 AM | #162 |
Captain
767
Rep 904
Posts |
Yeah, we all have our sweet spot, but I currently like the BMWs and Porsches from last decade’ish, because they’re still safe (I have a child) and somewhat reliable, yet also have hydraulic steering, lots of manual transmission options, etc. If I didn’t want the larger family space in my E82, I’d likely be driving a 987 or 997. I loved my 987 Cayman.
|
Appreciate
1
10"4974.50 |
08-01-2019, 10:38 AM | #163 | |
Colonel
4975
Rep 2,268
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
don't read this. too late...
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-01-2019, 07:56 PM | #164 |
Captain
467
Rep 804
Posts
Drives: Some fun stuff
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Philly, PA
|
Enthusiasts definitely makes decisions about cars and parts that confuse me. Like the OP, why spend money on a new car only to get something "better" within a couple of years. I never understood people who bought mods for cars they don't yet own---or dump like $10k into a car all at once.
But you know, there are likely people out there who look at my decisions and also shake their heads. At the end of the day though, who really cares? I mean does it really matter how people spend their money? Just because it doesn't fit my approach doesn't really mean it's actually wrong. And for the record there are 4 cars in my household: VW Corrado: Owned 19 yrs Hyundai Tucson: Owned 9 yrs (and with 146k miles) BMW M3: Owned 4 yrs Jeep SRT: Owned 7 months (nothing traded in for this) I'm not someone who typically jumps to trade cars, unless I really don't like driving the car or it's a problem. I don't want to keep my M3 forever, but I still enjoy it, so I haven't really considered selling it in any serious way. If someone made me a strong offer though, I'd certainly give it some thought. |
Appreciate
2
10"4974.50 bkfastwagon190.50 |
08-02-2019, 07:13 AM | #165 |
Major
1803
Rep 1,011
Posts |
Because spending $6k to have a USED engine put in the car seemed beyond stupid. Would have also put me another $6k into the car, that adds exactly zero to the value. Actually detracts from the value.
This seems pretty obvious to the average person. |
Appreciate
0
|
08-02-2019, 10:15 AM | #166 |
Lieutenant Colonel
2994
Rep 1,798
Posts |
Disposable car culture.
Without people flipping cars out of lease or warranty the used market would dry up tho. Would be nice if people in general took a higher level of care of their driving appliances tho. I'm noticing a lot more scuffed up bumpers and poorly maintained not so old cars spewing smoke. |
Appreciate
2
10"4974.50 Germanauto9702.50 |
08-02-2019, 10:46 AM | #167 |
Primo Generalissimo
4672
Rep 4,022
Posts
Drives: All of them
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: DC area
iTrader: (0)
Garage List 2017 Porsche 911 Ca ... [10.00]
2023 BMW M2 [9.00] 2023 Porsche Macan GTS [10.00] 2022 Ford F-250 Tremor [8.50] |
I will merely touch on some of my thoughts regarding this topic.
First, it’s my money and I’m allowed to spend it how I want within legal limits of course. Cars are becoming more and more recyclable although not fully, so buying new isn’t totally wasteful. I had to drive POSs when I was young and can now afford nicer, newer cars and a variety of driving experiences but am limited on space so cannot keep every car I buy. Cars as they become older do cost more to maintain. Even my venerable Jeep Cherokee that had 350,000 miles which we kept as a beater cost as much just to buy a new car despite supposedly being bulletproof. When someone is looking at replacing suspension and doing a lot of engine work as part of routine maintenance sometimes it’s just worth it to walk away. And there’s peace of mind knowing you won’t be left on the side of the road. Additionally, cars are generally safer than even a car made ten years ago. Just a few random thoughts about it. |
Appreciate
1
10"4974.50 |
08-02-2019, 11:06 AM | #168 | |
Colonel
4975
Rep 2,268
Posts |
Quote:
If you don't love a car then sure do whatever...
__________________
don't read this. too late...
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-02-2019, 01:24 PM | #169 | |
Major
1803
Rep 1,011
Posts |
Quote:
Love a car or not, that just plain doesn't make sense. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-02-2019, 01:41 PM | #170 |
Second Lieutenant
165
Rep 254
Posts |
How does it not? You either eat $6k to fix it or eat $6k on the evaluation of the car. Is it a tomato tomahto scenario
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-02-2019, 03:29 PM | #172 |
Second Lieutenant
165
Rep 254
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-02-2019, 04:56 PM | #173 | |
Major
1803
Rep 1,011
Posts |
Quote:
But I digress, we've been taking this way off topic. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-02-2019, 05:05 PM | #174 | |
Second Lieutenant
165
Rep 254
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-05-2019, 12:07 AM | #175 |
Major
1363
Rep 1,031
Posts
Drives: Like a bat out of hell.
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: here and there
|
Not the latest and certainly not the greatest but I traded my 2018 X1 for a 2019 430i Gran Coupe last week. It's not as practical as the X1 but it sure is a lot more fun.
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-05-2019, 05:59 AM | #176 |
Lieutenant Colonel
6477
Rep 1,966
Posts |
Motor Mouth: As it turns out, money can buy you happiness after all
Whoever said money can't buy you happiness just isn't doing it right by DAVID BOOTH | AUGUST 2, 2019 https://driving.ca/features/feature-...ness-after-all I have long held the belief that the “science” surrounding happiness is really just a ginormous crock of smelly brown stuff. I am not talking about just those idiotic self-help books — The New Good Life, 10% Happier, etc. — or even all those positive-thinking “life coaches” — I am looking at you, Tony Robbins — peddling the power of self-delusion. Even scholarly articles — titles like The Secret to Happiness are popular even amongst professional psychologists — perpetuate some truly outrageous fantasies, the most important of which, at least the most important to a car columnist, is that money can’t buy happiness. Yes, I am really going to take on the oldest truism in pop psychology, a maxim so popular, so universally accepted, that I’m guessing every parent at some point in time mouthed it. Yes, you know it. Let’s say it all together … Money can’t buy happiness. Now, let’s never mind that no one in a third world country has ever mouthed these words. Or that it takes the barest amount of common sense to understand that, even in a worst-case scenario, it’s probably better to be rich and unhappy than poor and unhappy. Let’s just take those as givens, shall we? What I’d really like to talk about is this misconception that possessions — the things we are supposedly wasting our money on — can’t make us happy. Indeed, the accepted wisdom seems to be that said possessions make us decidedly unhappier. The theory, as neatly explained by David Futrelle in Time magazine’s recent The Science of Happiness journal, is that, because we humans are adaptable creatures, we will always “overestimate how much pleasure we’ll get from having more.” We quickly adjust to our newfound wealth — the “hedonic treadmill,” Futrelle calls it — our increased affluence becoming our new paradigm. Thus, says the theory, the joy of the new car you just bought or the spanking new condo you just moved into will always be fleeting. The reason, goes the theory, that that the new Porsche or BMW isn’t making us happy is that we are always comparing ourselves to our neighbours, H.L. Mencken famously quipping that a happy man is one who makes $100 more than his wife’s sister’s husband. Happiness scholars, says Futrelle, have found that “how you stand relative to others makes a bigger difference in your sense of well-being than how much you make in an absolute sense,” which is the reason why, says the author, in the case of cars, when the shiny newness of said new Porsche wears off, “you don’t question the notion that you can buy happiness on a car lot,” but rather your choice of car. That’s why pretty much every author on the subject says that buying “experiences” is a surer road to fulfillment. “Things that don’t last create the most lasting happiness,” says Futrelle, mainly because, as he quotes Cornell University psychologist Tom Gilovich, “experience tend to blossom as you recall them,” not age like the suddenly tatty Chrysler in your driveway. Indeed, that seems to be the reason, according to a recent University of Colorado survey, that students got more pleasure out of “doing things” rather than “having things.” It is also, however, where this whole eschewing personal possessions theory falls apart. Last time I looked, the majority of said experiences — certainly the majority of the experiences that bring me pleasure — require a certain amount of … let’s call it equipment. For instance, I loving racing cars round a track and, having done pretty much nothing but for the last 30 years or so, I can absolutely assure you said experience will be a whole lot more joyful in a brand new Lamborghini than it will be in a clapped-out Toyota Camry. Anyone not understanding that simple equation either hasn’t driven a Lamborghini — which, counter to Futrelle’s thesis, I can assure you will remain a source of contentment long after the newness wears off — or has no idea of how to drive a car. The same would apply for anyone looking to “experience” off-road Jeeping, long-distance boat trailering or just the ordinary act of hauling of cord wood. Anyone thinking that the quality — and, hence, the cost — of your possessions won’t add to the joyfulness of your experience is probably just a poor person fooling themselves. Oh, I suppose one could make an argument for diminishing returns, that the rewards for trading up from a new $69,998 C8 Corvette to a $631,680 Lamborghini Aventador SVJ will not be commensurate with the monies spent. Or that possessing five Lamborghinis won’t make you happier than owning just one (though I can see an excellent argument to be made for having five Lambos stored at five different race tracks — let’s start with Laguna Seca — around the world). But such relativism works both ways. Sometimes it isn’t the absolute amount you spend, but rather the relative expenditure that matters. As an example, I have weathered many a rainstorm aboard a motorcycle in both cheap and expensive rain suits, and let me assure you that my “experience” has always been far “happier” when I was not chilled to the bone. I am in possession of both Bell Revolver ($300) and Schuberth E1 ($1,000) modular motorcycle helmets. Both share almost identical spec sheets, but wildly different build qualities. Care to guess which one makes me happier? And no, I have yet to suffer what Futrelle calls “hedonic adaption” — that which is superior eventually becoming our new norm — despite owning the latter for more than four years. Indeed, I just went out and bought an identical Schuberth precisely because I knew it would make my long-term experiences happy when the current one wears out. Indeed, the whole notion that “money can’t buy happiness” would seem to be based on the fallacy that the problem lies in the mere possession of a material good and not the reason to possess it. That trying to keep up with the Joneses will not make you happy in the long term — envy being, after all, the crack cocaine of emotions — is somehow still news absolutely baffles me. To blame the resultant lack of contentment on the possession and not the motivation is sheer idiocy. Indeed, even Futrelle quotes professor Gilovich as noting that people are “happiest when they are wringing experiences out of everything they spend money on.” Or, to quote a famous Lexus ad: “Whoever said money can’t buy happiness just isn’t doing it right.” |
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|