[chetrickerman]

Lol

[The Choosey begger]

.

[P1]

[P1]

[P1]

[JamesWWIII]

[Joekerr]

.

[JamesWWIII]

[The Choosey begger]

*

[2000cs]

Originally Posted by JamesWWIII

As far as I can see the Liberal Arts glass is the only one put to a good use and earning money. The scientist made something useless and unsustainable; the engineer, well, over-engineered and destroyed the usefulness of the original objects (except the tape, I suppose).

But I laughed anyway.

[JamesWWIII]

Originally Posted by 2000cs

As far as I can see the Liberal Arts glass is the only one put to a good use and earning money. The scientist made something useless and unsustainable; the engineer, well, over-engineered and destroyed the usefulness of the original objects (except the tape, I suppose).

But I laughed anyway.

I think you missed the joke.

[qba335i]

Originally Posted by JamesWWIII

I think you missed the joke.

Probably liberal arts major

[chetrickerman]

.

[2000cs]

Originally Posted by qba335i

Probably liberal arts major

I got the joke, although it really is more of an insult than a joke.
Yes, I was a LA major and have had the opportunity to employ many engineers and a few scientists throughout my career.

All kidding aside, each major provides for a good, useful education. What matters is how the graduates apply that education, and use it to grow. LA typically starts at a lower level because it isn’t a vocational degree (like Law, Medicine or Engineering), but used well can excel in those fields (graduate study), business, etc. Engineers also can broaden themselves and get to where they can look at people above the ankle, a few even eye-to-eye. . Good leaders come from all educational backgrounds (including non-degrees).

[King Rudi]

Originally Posted by chetrickerman

.

They'll be using this mentality heavily now they are endorsing Kaepernick. Lots of upset customers over this. I personally could care less, Nike doesn't make a lot of stuff that appeals to me regardless.

[Maestro]

Originally Posted by 2000cs

As far as I can see the Liberal Arts glass is the only one put to a good use and earning money. The scientist made something useless and unsustainable; the engineer, well, over-engineered and destroyed the usefulness of the original objects (except the tape, I suppose).

But I laughed anyway.

Okay you ruined that for me, then again I am an engineer so I saw it another way.

[Angry Ketchup]

Originally Posted by 2000cs

I got the joke, although it really is more of an insult than a joke.
Yes, I was a LA major and have had the opportunity to employ many engineers and a few scientists throughout my career.

All kidding aside, each major provides for a good, useful education. What matters is how the graduates apply that education, and use it to grow. LA typically starts at a lower level because it isn’t a vocational degree (like Law, Medicine or Engineering), but used well can excel in those fields (graduate study), business, etc. Engineers also can broaden themselves and get to where they can look at people above the ankle, a few even eye-to-eye. . Good leaders come from all educational backgrounds (including non-degrees).

Fine, fine... whatever, I'll have fries with that.

Thanks!

[King Rudi]

Originally Posted by Maestro

Okay you ruined that for me, then again I am an engineer so I saw it another way.

Same here. The way I see things is that without knowing what the desired end result is, how can anyone make any form of an assessment. The liberal arts cup has money in it, but if the desired result was to have forks adorned atop the glass, money or not, liberal arts failed. The liberal arts cup also rendered the original device useless with currency as I don't know of anyone who would drink from a cup that's has dirty money in it.

[Joekerr]

Less talking, more pictures.

[JamesWWIII]

[P1]

[chetrickerman]

.