02-14-2019, 02:03 PM | #1 |
(Sold) '00 M Roadster '06 M Coupe '16 M3 '20 X3MC
1633
Rep 2,604
Posts |
X3/X4M vs Stelvio Quad, by the numbers
assuming the weight listed at 4620 is incorrect (has to be right?)
DIN listing for the X3M is 1970KG which = 4343 lbs X3M/X4M with comp 4343 lbs 503 HP 442 torque 8 speed auto price around $84,000 US with options (figure $70K plus $7K comp and that allows another $7K for options like exec package) Alfa Stelvio Quad 4340 lbs 505 HP 443 torque 8 speed auto price around $84,000 fully loaded Now if the weight really is on par with the Stelvio (lets just hope for under 4400 lbs) that means performance wise it SHOULD be about equal. C&D tested the Stelvio 0-60 at 3.3 seconds and it had impressive 30-50/50-70 times as well (2.4/2.6). By comparison they tested the M3 (non comp) at 3.9 0-60 and 30-50/50-70 at 2.3/2.8 seconds, which really shows you the extra power and AWD really just helps at launch and get the heavier SUVs to compete on par with a M3 while already driving. now if all this is correct (can't wait for some road tests on the X3M) for the same price I would take the X3/X4M anyday over the Stelvio just because of the interior build quality and infotainment systems. |
02-15-2019, 11:35 AM | #2 |
Major General
5291
Rep 5,875
Posts |
The X3M just can't weigh more than 4400 lbs. Any more would be absurd but we'll see. Personally I expect to spec a comp model at $80k to include exec pack, paint ($550), and black/beige seat upgrade ($600? if we can calculate from German price brochure). Don't need the nanny tech and HK stereo already included.
I like the Stelvio Quad but don't want to deal with Alfa peculiarities and poor reliability even under warranty. |
Appreciate
0
|
02-15-2019, 12:40 PM | #3 |
Brigadier General
4984
Rep 4,978
Posts |
I think you are forgetting that throttle mapping and gear ratios make a pretty big difference.
Two cars can weigh exactly the same and have identical HP/TQ ratios and even both be 8 speed autos, but if the gear ratios, transmission mapping, and throttle mapping are different, they could have different results. Not to mention type and size of tires for initial grip matter too. We need more data before we make a conclusion that their performance should be the same or equal.
__________________
Wife's Car: 2020 X4M Competition, Alpine White on Black Alcantara and Biege
Current Car: 2018 F80 M3CS, SMB, DCT, ZEC, MPE Recently Departed: 2020 F87 M2C, LBB, ZEC, 6MT (Euro Delivery Aug. 29, 2019, totaled by an idiot in a Camry who then ran from the scene) Wife's Prior Car: 2018 F80 M3, Yas Marina Blue, DCT, Black 19s, Carbon Structure Anthracite Cloth/Leather Combination, Driving Assistance Package (Euro Delivery Oct. 9, 2017) |
03-04-2019, 08:21 PM | #4 | |
IG @bmwF9xG80
3859
Rep 7,614
Posts
Drives: G80 M3, X4M, G07 X7m50
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: NYC to NJ to Orlando FL
|
Quote:
__________________
60-130 6.5s X4M
60-130 5.04s G80 M3 Stock Turbo 60-130 4.82s | 9.4@148mph 1/4 Hybrids IG: @bmwF9XG80 |
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-06-2019, 11:22 PM | #5 | |
Banned
331
Rep 415
Posts |
Quote:
Contrary to popular belief, especially on these Bimmerpost Forums, my own actual experience and that of several Giulia Quadrifoglio owning friends, who also came from M3s, have actually found their Alfas to have been more reliable/trouble-free than their now departed M3s. Would have never expected it going into ownership based on Alfa’s prior reputation, but that’s our experience...albeit from a small sample size. In a nutshell, don’t prejudge a book by a few vocal complaints...some of which are not even true. Have seen lots of FUD spread on forums like this one, but glad I took a chance instead of listening to heresay. People should buy what appeals to them most, but if you’re not including the Alfa in the conversation at purchase time, you’re really missing out, trust me. And that is being said after owning 20+ higher spec German cars in a row. Lastly, I just paid $67k for my new Stelvio Quadrifoglio and $42k for my loaded Stelvio Ti Sport. The value proposition is absolutely outstanding. Pity more people aren’t willing to take a chance on Alfa, because the current deals on MY2018 Alfas is unheard of, as in 20% discount on the Stelvio Ti Sport and 25% discount on my Stelvio Quadrifoglio, and currently debating adding a fully-loaded 4C for 33% off MSRP. Last edited by mcc3456; 03-21-2019 at 09:06 AM.. |
|
Appreciate
3
|
03-07-2019, 07:56 AM | #6 | |
Major
254
Rep 1,391
Posts |
Quote:
Perception take a long time to change It takes Lexus over 20-years to finally earn it's respect, so Alfa better be patient and keeps building solid cars or that perception will turn to reality |
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-07-2019, 10:46 AM | #7 | |
Banned
331
Rep 415
Posts |
Quote:
If you haven't driven a Quadrifoglio (Giulia or Stelvio) for an extended test drive (more than a 4 mile beat) then try one out. It is a hell of car. Sort of like merging an M3 with an RS5 taking the best attributes from each...except for the infotainment, but even there, I actually prefer simplicity to complexity because cars are like...for driving! The Alfa Stelvio Quadrifoglio vs. BMW X3M vs. AMG GLC63 vs. Jaguar F Pace SVR vs. Porsche Macan Turbo Performance Pack comparison tests are going to be epic. Great time to be alive! |
|
Appreciate
1
FSociety3859.00 |
03-07-2019, 06:02 PM | #8 | |
Colonel
5003
Rep 2,627
Posts |
Quote:
With that said, though, I would respectfully continue to maintain that for those of us who need the cargo volume, only the F-Pace SVR is a contender to the X3M in your grouping. If you had written X4M instead, well, that would be a comparison. But the AS Quad, GLC, Macan will never enter into the equation for those of us needing/desiring these performance SUVs for their interior hauling capacity. We really only have the SVR for a true apples-apples performance and cargo hauling comparison. The Cayenne and X5M enter the next size realm, so for us, it really is just the X3M or SVR. |
|
Appreciate
1
ando2258.00 |
03-07-2019, 08:32 PM | #9 |
Second Lieutenant
137
Rep 238
Posts |
Max well can you post the cargo space areas with all rear seats down up to the drivers seat. I currently have a 2008 X5 4.8i and I am looking to upgrade soon. I must have the cargo space to keep two medium dog crates in on rare occasions but always need at least one dog crate to fit since this will be my new dog hauler. I am looking at the X3m, Glc 63, f pace svr because I love the performance and smaller nimble size if the dog crates will fit. Worse case I will settle for less performance and look at the 2020 Gle 450 or 2019 50i X5 if two dog crates won't work in the smaller performance suvs.
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-07-2019, 09:49 PM | #10 |
(Sold) '00 M Roadster '06 M Coupe '16 M3 '20 X3MC
1633
Rep 2,604
Posts |
Wow, Alfa Stelvio Quad is listing for 10% off sticker before even negotiating.
I have a feeling next winter the Jaguar F Pace SVR will be similar, because loaded these are about $4,000 more than the X3M Comp will be. |
Appreciate
0
|
03-08-2019, 07:18 AM | #11 | |
Banned
331
Rep 415
Posts |
Quote:
In my case, I threw a set of 255/45/20 snow tires in the back of my GF’s X3, but at the last minute she could not follow me to the garage, so I tossed them into the back of the Stelvio no problem. Was it a bit tighter, yes, slightly, but they still fit with some some room to spare...and to put it into perspective, those are damn wide tires. That is the largest thing I need to haul twice a year, so the Stelvio works perfectly for me, and I definitely wouldn’t swap it for a regular X3 30 based on driving dynamics alone, which is way more important to me. However, if one is hauling dog crate regularly, so something that absolutely has to fit, before going by cargo stats alone, one should check to make sure that the actually item fits in whatever vehicle that is chosen, because every SUV in the segment has “different” dimensions...even if on paper the total volume is the same. Sometimes a vehicle with overall less cargo volume might fit something a statistically larger vehicle might not. Take it from me based on owning a Porsche Cayenne at one point, and also cross shopping an X5 when buying a 2011 X3. Better to be precise than sorry later once you already have the vehicle in your garage. |
|
Appreciate
1
FSociety3859.00 |
03-08-2019, 07:25 AM | #12 | |
Banned
331
Rep 415
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-08-2019, 07:46 AM | #13 |
Second Lieutenant
137
Rep 238
Posts |
Mcc I agree 100% I just didn't know if the glc 63 and x3m will have the exact same cargo space layouts/space as the normal versions of the x3 and glc 300. Also price wise what kind of % off msrp can I expect on an ordered x3m? I got a fantastic deal on my M4 when it first came out but that sales advisor retired.
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-08-2019, 08:29 AM | #15 | |
Major
254
Rep 1,391
Posts |
Quote:
Also BMWNA is pushing back on dealer as far as bonuses tier (in short, very hard for CA to get bonus). My CA also retired right before I bought my M3. Now with "gag" order good luck finding info on anything in the forums; like "trunk-money", base MF, special interest rate, incentives etc etc etc But my feeling is X3M/X4M initially would command MSRP, then discounted. Unless BMWNA control production limit etc ala M2 |
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-08-2019, 08:34 AM | #17 | |
Banned
331
Rep 415
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-09-2019, 06:11 AM | #18 |
Captain
315
Rep 788
Posts |
now waiting july to have the 1st media's review and Nürburgring laptime. We will see if the BMW M CEO speech of last year will be respected and if the cars set a new benchmark in that segment. But with the official figures they gave, I wonder how it will set a new benchmark. |
Appreciate
0
|
03-09-2019, 09:49 AM | #19 | |
Banned
70
Rep 93
Posts |
Quote:
Nurburgring speaks more than anything else to real enthusiasts ! |
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-09-2019, 01:55 PM | #20 | |
Colonel
5003
Rep 2,627
Posts |
Quote:
If the HP is underrated and actually closer to 525, however, and if they subtract 125 lbs (without a moon roof and rails) so Wt/HP is closer to 8.56, it would make for a more interesting challenge. Not that it will alter our X3M comp order one way or the other, but am curious to see how it pans out. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-09-2019, 02:29 PM | #21 |
Major General
5291
Rep 5,875
Posts |
There is just no way that the X3M is going to weigh 4600 lbs as the current information would have it. That's heavier by a significant margin than everything else in this segment. It just has to be in 4400 range which certainly changes the weight:HP ratio.
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-09-2019, 04:09 PM | #22 |
Colonel
5003
Rep 2,627
Posts |
I agree, which is one reason I haven't posted an updated Performance spreadsheet yet. I entered the data on day of release but it just doesn't make sense for a Mnfr which prides itself on efficiency of design and use of light weight materials to present those numbers. I also researched the weight differences one might expect with a 6 vs a V8 - seems about 100-150 lbs difference in same model line-ups (but defer to those with more knowledge). Most of the other models are 8's, so that can't account for the apparent discrepancy. And if anything, for 'performance' models one would expect lighter weight components...
|
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|