Quote:
Originally Posted by bkfastwagon
Visually underwhelming. I'm not doubting the performance but overall design is a let down for me. Front bumper is almost too aggressive and the rear fails to balance this. Neither elegant nor aggressive …
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by bobbylechat
Imho it doesn't differ enough from a regular X3 m sport to be a real M model. Like others said, i don't doubt that the performance will be there but as far as visual goes, I'm not convinced
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dmboone25
I do wish the back end, especially the wheel arches, were more aggressive - the front is growing on me though.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Croatian test driver
I consider the X3 M as my possible next car, but it looks a bit "boring". The only "M-looking" part is the front, everything else looks almost like a regular M Sport X3 …
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by rarlyl8
I don't get it. Don't see much of anything sporty, stylish, or even an suv.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by paliknight
The performance will be noticeable but visually they'll be difficult to distinguish unless you get closer and read the badges. Compared to the differences between the other base cars and their M counterparts, this M is lacking the visual differences M cars usually have.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ASAP
little disappointed ... the booty and overall width with no flares doesn't impress
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by M3_WC
The lack of some simple lip flares like the X5M is disappointing. It does look too narrow.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ZHPsedan
Personal preferences, but I'd prefer X3M looks with competition horsepower and a Carbon roof.
|
Maybe they’ll listen to the feedback and consider modifications for the LCI (or CS, or whatever you want to call it). And agree with ZHPsedan – at least offer CFRP roof option at this high-performance level.