View Single Post
      11-03-2020, 01:42 PM   #45
XAlp
Lieutenant Colonel
728
Rep
1,720
Posts

Drives: Volvo XC90 T6
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Cambridge

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by ColoM40i View Post
Just my opinion.....

I can understand one retrofitting the cargo sub floor to accommodate a spare if the X3 did not come with one and having to pay $550.00 for the spare and misc. items. But, to order the vehicle without one and then putting out $550.00, your time & efforts only to be carrying a jammed in half flat spare tire does not make sense. And then you have to carry a tire pump.
Adding the spare saver tire option at the time of build only costs $150.00 and you have a fully inflated spare that is properly secured.

I just did the measuring in my new M40i. The floor is elevated a minimal 3" which equals a loss of just 2.39 (total) cu. ft. How often does anyone really pack their cargo area to take up the entire side to side, top to bottom cargo capacity?
Hi. Am I right that a normal trunk volume is 28.7 cu ft so this would be an 8% reduction? I'm asking as I'm thinking of moving from an F31 and had hoped for the bigger trunk (again my maths X3 550litres v f31 495litres would have the F31 10% smaller than X3, right?). So still a very marginal gain over F31 even with the reudced volume for a space saver? And a probably stupid question - can you replace the raised cover for a space saver with the normal floor to gain extra space?
Thanks
__________________
Previously: 2007 Alpina D3 Saloon, 2010 Alpina D3 Biturbo Saloon, 2014 335d XDrive M Sport+ Touring, 2003 Honda S2000.
Now: 2018 Volvo XC90 T6 Inscription Pro, 2013 Mazda MX5 2.0 BBR Super 200.
Appreciate 0