11-08-2011, 10:51 AM | #1 |
Lieutenant Colonel
126
Rep 1,781
Posts |
Staggered vs. All Season
I have the 19" 309s with summer performance tires. They are staggered; F245/45/19 R275/40/19. The lowest PSI rating is 31F and 35R.
They are being replaced with the 19" 309s with all seasons. These are not staggered; F245/45/19 R245/45/19. The lowest PSI rating is 31F and 31R. When replaced, will my ride comfort improve? Driving in Chicago with these god-awful roads, I continue to feel "mechanical sympathy" for my car, and driving is becoming less enjoyable. I also want to know why the 19" 309s can't be fitted with tires that have more sidewall. The run flats are just terrible, and I'd like some more cushion. The GLK is standard with 19s, but the tires have significantly more meat. The X3s wheel wells look as though more tire radius would fit. I also want to know why BMW did not fit the front wheels with double-wishbone suspension. I know it's more expensive, but they put it on the X5. I know double-wishbone is more comfortable than MacPherson strut suspension, and it also allows for greater driving stability. What gives? |
11-08-2011, 12:53 PM | #2 |
Major
74
Rep 1,271
Posts |
I don't see your ride comfort improving...you still have the same amount of sidewall. Are you 309s a square set up? The rears are an inch wider otherwise...and looks like you are running 245s all the way around for the winter.
If you increase the sidewall on the tires on the 309s make sure it is the same front and rear and make sure you know how that will affect your speedometer. |
Appreciate
0
|
11-08-2011, 01:50 PM | #3 | |
Second Lieutenant
18
Rep 274
Posts |
Quote:
The best way to improve your road feel is to go with smaller diameter wheels, decrease the stiffness of the tires, and reduce the rolling mass of the wheel assembly. Run flat tires are very stiff and have a large mass so this contributes to the problem. Perhaps your best option is to get 17" or 18" tires that are less stiff. Double-wishbone suspension generally has the fewest compromises of all the suspension designs and allows the designer to have the most freedom in his design. However, double-wishbone is also not very spatially efficient. To make more room for the engine components MacPherson struts are used. I'm not sure that is such a bad decision. Double-wishbone suspension can offer excellent camber stability as well as other advantages (structural advantages are probably immense). But a passenger car suspension has such a massive range of travel, usage, loads, ect that it seems extremely difficult to tailor the suspension to actually use these benefits. If the designers choose to use a double wishbone because of the perceived superiority to MacPherson struts but generates poor geometry to save space then they have not created a better geometry. I guess what I am getting at is... a bad double wishbone suspension is not better than a good MacPherson strut suspension. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-08-2011, 02:53 PM | #4 |
Brigadier General
91
Rep 3,855
Posts |
Style over comfort Judd
__________________
F25 xDrive20d SE __ professional multimedia package | dynamic package | climate package | 309s | xline | xenons | electric seats | folding mirrors | business speakers |
Appreciate
0
|
11-08-2011, 03:34 PM | #5 |
Banned
17
Rep 412
Posts |
I personally think it's a pretty soft setup. My preference is to switch to "Sport" where you get more road feel and less of the waterbed effect. I have the tire pressures set at 32F/35R.
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-08-2011, 04:22 PM | #6 | ||
Lieutenant Colonel
126
Rep 1,781
Posts |
Quote:
Quote:
Well I'll hardly be sacrificing style. The tires just won't be staggered, so the rear will be a little less brawny, but no matter. The side profiles are enhanced by the 309s whether or not they're staggered. You know it's funny how different we all think our cars ride. The roads here SUCK, and yes, the suspension is a bit wallowy normal mode, but the ride is too harsh in sport with these 19" 309s. Too many expansion joints, too many potholes, too many washboarded roads, too many lips, bumps, cracks, etc. |
||
Appreciate
0
|
11-08-2011, 04:31 PM | #7 | |
Second Lieutenant
18
Rep 274
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-08-2011, 04:47 PM | #8 | |
Major
74
Rep 1,271
Posts |
Quote:
Last edited by fedinand; 11-08-2011 at 04:53 PM.. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-08-2011, 06:01 PM | #10 |
Lieutenant General
418
Rep 12,276
Posts |
By more sidewall, I assume you mean a higher aspect ratio tire. You can only achieve that by going to a smaller diameter wheel, like an 18". The diameter of the outside of the tire must remain constant (within a very low tolerance) or it can cause you some problems. Most importantly, it can cause problems with the drivetrain for AWD. You could check with a knowledgeable technician on that, in case I'm wrong. It will also throw your speedometer and odometer out of calibration.
__________________
I think it is bad luck to be superstitious |
Appreciate
0
|
11-08-2011, 06:32 PM | #11 | |
Lieutenant Colonel
126
Rep 1,781
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-08-2011, 06:49 PM | #12 |
Private
14
Rep 83
Posts |
I have always thought it was aspect ratio of height to width. So the 45 would mean the height of the sidewall is 45% of the width (110mm) in the example 245/45/19. I think.
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-08-2011, 07:37 PM | #13 |
Major
74
Rep 1,271
Posts |
Tirerack to the rescue...from their site: Sidewall Aspect Ratio
Typically following the three digits identifying the tire's Section Width in millimeters is a two-digit number that identifies the tire's profile or aspect ratio. P225/50R16 91S The 50 indicates that this tire size's sidewall height (from rim to tread) is 50% of its section width. The measurement is the tire's section height, and also referred to as the tire's series, profile or aspect ratio. The higher the number, the taller the sidewall; the lower the number, the lower the sidewall. We know that this tire size's section width is 225mm and that its section height is 50% of 225mm. By converting the 225mm to inches (225 / 25.4 = 8.86") and multiplying it by 50% (.50) we confirm that this tire size results in a tire section height of 4.43". If this tire were a P225/70R16 size, our calculation would confirm that the size would result in a section height of 6.20", approximately a 1.8-inch taller sidewall. |
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|