05-30-2013, 03:20 PM | #1 |
Major
75
Rep 1,179
Posts |
Mazda CX-5 beats X3?
Last year I tried a 30d Msport and was left thoroughly disappointed. I then tried a Honda CRV (new 4th gen) 2.2D EX which had better steering and brakes but was not as pretty, rolled too much round corners and is not available in dark metallic blue. Overall I felt it was a better car than the X3, particularly when comparing prices of similar equipped cars. I then looked around and found the Mazda CX-5 in AWD 175ps Sport Nav trim. Imo, the best looking out of the 3 and the best driver's car too. Excellent driving and pedal position. Manual gearbox is short throw and very slick, brakes and steering good with the former having plenty of feel and the EPS not bad at all. Very little body roll considering the height of the car. Granted some of the interior plastic on the lower part of the dashboard and some on the door cards are not as good as the X3 but the rest is. The fit and finish is also very good and everything feels very well made and robust. It also runs on normal tyres and comes with a spare wheel, which was essential for me. Mazda have copied the BMW design for their idrive and rotary heating controls. The dash reminded me of BMW. The 175PS diesel engine is an absolute peach. Peak power is at 4,500 RPM and it revs to 5,500rpm but it's so quiet and does not sound like a diesel at all, even at low speed.
It also weighs around 100kg less than a 20d, spec for spec and is vastly cheaper to buy. I don't care about residuals because I'll keep the car until it dies. I'm expecting it to be reliable as it's Japanese. Service costs are a little cheaper than BMW too. Service one is £250 all in, service 2 £285 and service 3 £303. It is chain driven (like BMW) so no cam belts to replace. The only negatives, DAB is not available and Mazda UK have no idea when it will or if it can be dealer retrofitted in the future! Whilst having a fully powered driver's seat, there is no memory settings. I'd recommend anyone to have a test drive in one after driving an X3 before making one's mind up. |
05-30-2013, 04:54 PM | #3 |
Inspector Gadget
17
Rep 202
Posts |
Fully loaded it's £28,695.
It's probably a great car. I don't think i'd even consider test driving one though. I don't like the look of it & there's no 6 cylinder diesel. It's not distinctive enough. I'm sure it's a fabulous car though, and at £28,695 for a fully loaded model it wont break the bank in comparison to other crossovers. Like the X3...
__________________
MY14 X3 35d M-Sport. Born 19/04/13, Delivered 31/05/13. Alpine White, Red Brown Leather, Brushed Aluminium, 19" 369 Alloys, BMW Media - Professional, Visibility Package, Access Package, Electric Seats w/ Lumbar, Variable Damper Control, Panoramic Roof, Extended Storage, HUD & Black Panel Dash, DAB, Reversing Camera & Top View, Heated Steering Wheel, Heated Rear Seats, Apps, Internet, BMW Loudspeaker Professional... & More.
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-30-2013, 05:08 PM | #4 |
Major General
863
Rep 5,448
Posts |
I have had a few mazda's over the years, they are a ways from a BMW, but much better driving than anything from Honda or Toyota for the most part if your looking for a sporty ride!
Doubt anyone is cross shopping them here in the US, CX-5 starts at 21k X3 starts at 40k.
__________________
2022 X3M Brooklyn Grey
2008 E93 335i FBO 2012 Mercedes C63 Black Series Alanite Grey |
Appreciate
0
|
05-30-2013, 05:36 PM | #5 |
Lieutenant Colonel
330
Rep 1,560
Posts
Drives: 2022 X4M40i, retired ‘11 X3
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: MI
|
184 horsepower For the Mazda vs 300 for the 35i. Don't think I'd even bother looking.
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-30-2013, 06:02 PM | #6 |
Colonel
99
Rep 2,323
Posts |
The CX5 and the X3 is not even in the same league, comparing apples to oranges really. Mazda does handle pretty well, but that's it. The whole car is full of cheap material and safety rating is not as good as BMW. Personally, Mazda is pretty close to the bottom of my list as far as Japanese cars are concerned.
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-30-2013, 07:37 PM | #7 |
Lieutenant Colonel
105
Rep 1,511
Posts |
I compared the kia sportage with x3 when I was shopping and found it to be much better value than the bimmer.
It also had a better warranty and 30hp less than my 35i. Mazda only sells the soccer mom version of the cx5 in Canada... If the skyactive diesel sold here I would have considered it. I don't consider my x3 a premium product and bmw doesn't treat me like a premium brand purchaser... I got the bimmer because it was fun to drive. The mazdas are known for their fun to drive character so enjoy the new wheels
__________________
2013, AW, xDrive35i, M Sport Package, Technology Package, Dynamic Comfort Package, Premium Package, 3M Clear Bra, Euro foglight switch, a few coded fixes
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-30-2013, 08:54 PM | #9 |
Lieutenant Colonel
105
Rep 1,511
Posts |
Yep, I'm no brand snob.
No doubt the x3 is the performance champ but it shouldn't be confused as a luxury vehicle. Expensive? Sure. Excellent engineering? Sure. Value? Not so much. Innovative? Not really. The low compression Mazda diesel is very interesting.
__________________
2013, AW, xDrive35i, M Sport Package, Technology Package, Dynamic Comfort Package, Premium Package, 3M Clear Bra, Euro foglight switch, a few coded fixes
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-31-2013, 03:08 AM | #11 | |
New Member
0
Rep 25
Posts |
Quote:
__________________________________________________ _______________2013 3.0d X3 M-sport Deep Sea Blue, Black Leather, Xenons, DIRAC Professional Sound sytem, Pro Nav, 19" Wheels, Tinted windows, Folding Mirrors, PDC, ASS, DAB Radio, Aluminium trim inc roof bars |
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-31-2013, 08:44 AM | #12 | |
Enlisted Member
9
Rep 42
Posts |
Quote:
The Qashqai was very good value with lots of gadgets, but the driving experience very much felt like a small car in a negative way. The Sportage was also good value but during the test drive I remember the adjective 'boring' just popping into my head as I was driving along. The X1, despite its heavy steering was a noticeably more engaging experience and I suddenly got excited about buying a new car having been so disillusioned with the Japanese efforts. It then occurred to us that, due to family expansion, we would outgrow the X1 part way through the lease. I was not too keen on the exterior either and the X3 seemed a better fit. 6 months on and I am still very pleased with my choice. Only complaints would be:- - the phone preparation in the under armrest storage compartment. What a total waste of space for something which as far as I can tell provides no real functionality benefit. - the BMW online services, whilst great in principle, are very poorly executed in practice. - the in-car email does not work with iphones. - satnav is full of glitches and very unreliable. Other than that and notwithstanding the considerable extra cost, I am glad I opted for the BMW. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-31-2013, 10:05 AM | #14 |
Colonel
99
Rep 2,323
Posts |
$44000 for a Mazda, there is a sucker born every minute The same CX5 in a gas version here would be around $25000. Seriously, if I were to buy a diesel engine, it would not be a Japanese car. The Europeans have much more experience designing and building diesel engines.
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-31-2013, 10:11 AM | #15 |
Private First Class
12
Rep 144
Posts
Drives: 2012 F25 N52T
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Boston, MA
|
I had a chance to drive a CX-5 grand touring this memorial day wknd and few things I like better than X3.
1. Rain-sensing wiper is very sensitive than my x3, it picked up a slight drizzle which I didn't even notice on the windshield. 2. Blind-spot system in the side mirrors are very intuitive, with blinking indicators based on distance. Very accurate though. 3. Steering wheel feel and design, looks like one from pure sports car. 4. Drives like a miata. Not quick as x3 but very agile. |
Appreciate
0
|
05-31-2013, 10:21 AM | #16 |
Private First Class
17
Rep 103
Posts |
You're not familiar with prices in the UK are you? My X3 20d MSport with a manual gearbox and a few toys (no navigation though) had a list price of over £40,000, so in excess of US$60,000. You guys would get a top specification X3 35i Auto for less than that.
Hopefully that explains why a Mazda loaded with extras at £28,000 doesn't seem so bad after all.
__________________
2017 Porsche 911 Carrera GTS and 2019 BMW X3M Competition
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-31-2013, 10:30 AM | #17 | |
New Member
0
Rep 25
Posts |
Quote:
Mind you - I wouldn't spend that much on a Mazda - __________________________________________________ ________________________________________________ 2013 3.0d X3 M-sport Deep Sea Blue, Black Leather, Xenons, DIRAC Professional Sound sytem, Pro Nav, 19" Wheels, Tinted windows, Folding Mirrors, PDC, ASS, DAB Radio, Aluminium trim inc roof bars |
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-31-2013, 01:09 PM | #18 |
Private
1
Rep 81
Posts |
I am quite disappointed that nobody is comparing the Dacia Duster (just google it) with the X3. I am not sure, but it seems that the Dacia is somewhat cheaper. Some may even say that it is better value for money
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-31-2013, 01:59 PM | #19 | |
Colonel
99
Rep 2,323
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-31-2013, 02:24 PM | #20 | |
Colonel
432
Rep 2,527
Posts |
Quote:
I think with the former Audi head of design at the helm of Kia and Hyundai they may have some real contenders in the next generation of vehicles. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-31-2013, 03:48 PM | #22 |
Lieutenant
106
Rep 590
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|