08-03-2012, 08:21 AM | #1 |
Private
4
Rep 96
Posts
Drives: 2012 X3
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: NJ
|
Consumer Reports rates 2013 X3 tops
Inthe current issue of CR, they rate the 2013 X3 #1 in its segment. They say the current turbo 4 isn't as refined as the old 6 cyl. They said that the stop/start sends a shutter through the car when it starts again.
Funny that they found the gas mileage with the new turbo 4 was on average only 1 mpg better than the previous 6 cyl. I am glad that I purchased the 2012 2.8. Got a great deal on it. I originally was going to wait for the turbo 4 because of the hype surrounding the better gas mileage but decided to go with the 2.8 6 cyl instead. |
08-03-2012, 08:42 AM | #2 |
First Lieutenant
78
Rep 390
Posts |
oh man i currently have the turbo 4 loaner, it really isnt impressive. im glad i got the 35i. i dont mind the 2 more L/ 100km, sweet ride and sexier noise. Turning on Q5 2.0T and N20 engine turns me off
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-03-2012, 08:55 AM | #3 |
Private
0
Rep 70
Posts |
I couldn't be more happy with my 2012 28i, naturally aspirated inline 6! I'm sure the turbo 4 is a great engine but the thought of it does turn me off a bit, as does the Q5.
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-03-2012, 09:06 AM | #4 |
Captain
72
Rep 876
Posts |
Good to hear. I think BMW definitely hit a home run with this little sport-ute, regardless of the engine choice.
With that being said, there's certainly some valid nostalgic feeling of that nice 3.0L. It was a gem of a motor. |
Appreciate
0
|
08-03-2012, 09:34 AM | #5 |
*Bimmerpost Plasti Dip Guru*
81
Rep 1,174
Posts
Drives: E53, E46-M3, E70, F25-X3
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: New Jersey (NJ)
|
Consumer reports always bish about that all BMWs aren't always refined. They seriously need to use other words than refined......
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-03-2012, 10:01 AM | #6 |
Lieutenant Colonel
110
Rep 1,772
Posts |
I had an X1 loaner 28i last year with the 2.0 liter turbo and was impressed with what the engine could do but hated the bland character. After that, I knew I wouldn't buy any BMW that had it so if I could afford a 6-cylinder, I'd have to consider other makes. Painful conclusion for a guy who has loved BMW since 1984.
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-03-2012, 11:12 AM | #7 |
Major
37
Rep 1,413
Posts |
It is just a confirmations on how I feel about the new gen X3. It caught my attentions the first time I've seen it. I can't say the same thing with the first gen X3.
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-03-2012, 12:28 PM | #8 |
ZitoHellada
3
Rep 37
Posts |
For those out there on the fence between an 28i and 35i and can fork over the extra cash you won't regret the 35i. You'd be hard pressed to find an engine out there that can match the performance with the fuel economy. After 3 months I'm still amazed and my mpg is increasing incrementally daily. And my foot is on the heavier side. I'm coming from a e92 328i (6 speed). As much as I thought I'd miss it from a driving and fuel efficiency standpoint, I cant say that I do, besides the occasional itch to row through gears.
__________________
There is no 'ctr' button on Chuck Norris' computer. Chuck Norris is always in control!
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-03-2012, 09:32 PM | #9 | |
Lieutenant Colonel
45
Rep 1,876
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-06-2012, 06:07 PM | #10 |
Brigadier General
817
Rep 3,341
Posts
Drives: 2022 M3, 2022 X5 40i;
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Northeast
|
I'm going to have to disagree.
I felt like the 2.0L engine was more than adequate - actually quite impressive. Impressive enough to save $4000 and the additional lost in MPGs and get the smaller engine. The 2 things it lacks is a reasonable engine sound, and some fine tuning on the auto start/stop feature. Have the N55 in my e90 and I thought I'd be sold on the same in the F25... but the difference just isn't significant enough for me to justify an additional $4K+. I've had 2 vehicles with the previous inline-6 and i have mixed emotions with them. My first one felt fantastic, my second one felt sluggish and underpowered. It even had worse gas mileage than my N55! |
Appreciate
0
|
08-07-2012, 08:56 AM | #12 | |
Private First Class
14
Rep 166
Posts
Drives: 2011 BMW X3 (F25) xDrive 28i
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Québec city (Canada)
|
Quote:
And I'd rather have the atmospheric in line 6 instead the 4 turbo. 6 is the softest, have a most beautiful sound and proven reliability. I don't trust the reliability of the turbo engine, we will see in a few years what it is |
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-07-2012, 09:13 AM | #13 |
Second Lieutenant
7
Rep 221
Posts |
I'm sure the turbo 4 is a great engine and if you are trying to keep the cost down on your X3 it is a great option. But it's not like the $4000 price difference is for the engine alone. There are a lot more standard features in the 35i for that extra $4000. If you add the missing feature to a 28i your not really saving much money. And the 2 mpg difference between the 28i and 35i will only gain you about 36 miles per tank of gas or about $6 worth of gas. I will gladly pay the extra $6 for the pure joy I get from the Turbo 6 in the 35i.
__________________
2012 X3 35i | Deep Sea Blue | Oyster |
Packages | Sports | Cold Weather | Cold Weather 2 | Premium | Technology | Premium Sound |
Appreciate
0
|
08-07-2012, 09:36 AM | #14 | |
Major
37
Rep 1,413
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-07-2012, 10:30 AM | #15 | |
Brigadier General
817
Rep 3,341
Posts
Drives: 2022 M3, 2022 X5 40i;
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Northeast
|
Quote:
Identically equipped, fully loaded, X3s differ by exactly $3900. Which, not surprisingly, is the differential between a fully loaded F30 328xi and 335xi If you're not comparing apples and apples, sure you can get a stripped down 35i for the same price, even less than a loaded 28i. Price differential at base is $5100 not $3900 for an X3 - and nearly $6000 for an F30. So yes, you are saving $4000 on the engine alone... and for the extra 600lbs it adds as well, there is limited value in that additional 60hp and 40tq in an SUV. I can't disagree that the N55 puts a smile on anyone's face, but it's more of a smirk compared to the smile that you get from a 800lb lighter sedan or coupe. But that's the beauty of car companies, people can choose what they value more. I'd rather not waste $4000 on an engine in an SUV if the base one is adequate at highway passing speeds. If you feel that it's worth it to you, or got a fantastic deal on one, that's fantastic - I went into the dealership thinking I'd get the one with the N55 too as I love mine in my e90 - but I found the N20 not only impressive, but the better value to me. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-07-2012, 12:04 PM | #16 | |
Second Lieutenant
7
Rep 221
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
2012 X3 35i | Deep Sea Blue | Oyster |
Packages | Sports | Cold Weather | Cold Weather 2 | Premium | Technology | Premium Sound Last edited by colson79; 08-07-2012 at 12:47 PM.. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-07-2012, 01:43 PM | #17 |
Lieutenant Colonel
104
Rep 1,511
Posts |
The moonroof is a $1800 option on the 35i in Canada. ...just saying.
__________________
2013, AW, xDrive35i, M Sport Package, Technology Package, Dynamic Comfort Package, Premium Package, 3M Clear Bra, Euro foglight switch, a few coded fixes
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-07-2012, 02:03 PM | #18 |
Captain
72
Rep 876
Posts |
I'd argue that the N20 equipped F30 isn't much different feeling than an N55 equipped F30 (5.1 vs 5.7 0-60)
While having the N55 in the X3 you see a much larger performance discrepancy between the N20 X3 (5.5 vs 6.6 0-60) So in my opinion the heavier X3 really shines when coupled with the N55. It's a harder argument for the N55 3 series though. |
Appreciate
0
|
08-10-2012, 12:47 PM | #19 |
Enlisted Member
4
Rep 46
Posts
Drives: 2013 X3 28i 2018 530i
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Anchorage
|
28i is refined
I have well over 2000 mile now on my 2013 28i and I find that it is a very refined 4 cylinder, in fact it is so quite I once left it running by mistake while out to dinner. It idled cool and quite. I suppose if you need the heavy sound to enrich your ride you might want to get the larger engine but my MPG around town rarely drops below 20.5 and usually runs over 21 with stop and go driving with more power than I can use. The auto shut off is hard to get used to but I think I may look into changing that as the default if not, just get used to pushing an extra button every time I start out.
All in all ConsummerReports had it right making me feel great about my choice. They seemed favor the great mileage that is actually better than they experienced and the only time I notice the sound of the four cylinder is with windows down running in a garage with the door open of course Looking forward to seeing how it handles in the winter but when it comes to summer I have power to spare and a firm sporty feel. |
Appreciate
0
|
08-11-2012, 11:41 AM | #20 |
Enlisted Member
0
Rep 48
Posts |
After nearly 5,000 miles there is no doubt the 2.8 is the right choice for our family. The extra power is nice, but how much is enough? Approx. 1 second faster and slight worse mileage justify nearly $5,000 CDN is vehicles?
The logic of greater standard options of the 3.5 assumes you don't order any other packages. Most people order at least 2 of the Executive, Premium and Technology packages. With little difference on the model package prices, you still have approx the same $5,000 difference.
__________________
SLAM
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-11-2012, 01:27 PM | #21 |
Lieutenant
13
Rep 579
Posts |
I believe prior to the turbo 4 the price difference between the 28i and 35i was also slightly lower. In the last 1 or 2 model years BMW changed some of the packages around and made the gap between both models wider.
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-18-2012, 11:15 PM | #22 |
Private
7
Rep 71
Posts |
YVMV - I test drove both the 35i and the 28i 2013 model year. I honestly prefer the 28i. I'm coming from a 400hp subie WRX - I appreciate a good band of acceleration. I'm sorry but the price difference does not justify the minimal increase between the two. Maybe I'm missing something or maybe my 35i test drive wasn't on a good track. All I know is after taking out the 28i, I looked over to my CA and exclaimed 'this is the 4?!'.
Bottom line is test drive both and pick what you like best! Also, I keep reading that people mention that they like the engine noise - aren't you actually hearing the exhaust?? Thanks, dr |
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|