09-28-2014, 10:37 AM | #47 | ||
Lieutenant Colonel
364
Rep 1,517
Posts |
Quote:
|
||
Appreciate
0
|
09-28-2014, 12:36 PM | #48 | |
Major General
6243
Rep 6,523
Posts |
Quote:
I have owned a wagon and an F10 5 series. Would have bought an F11 if available here. Almost bought an E61 wagon CPO but the N54 issues and the leaking sunroof killing the rear suspension module issues kept me away. Initially REALLY wanted to like the GT. But the overly complicated hatch, the odd rear looks, the high rider stance and the softened front end completely ruin the look. THe extra weight from the hatch arrangement and the raised stance means you'd be better off with an X5. I looked again after the LCI, but the truth is that I was able to fit all of out kids gear in the f10. Stroller, bags, etc. The wacky closed hatchback partition design kills utility of the GT vs the wagon. It is much, much closer to the sedan than the wagon, IMO, in terms of practicality. I'd be interested in seeing GT sales volume vs wagon for the 5. I bet BMW would have sold more wagons. I know I would have bought one. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-28-2014, 12:41 PM | #49 |
First Lieutenant
131
Rep 371
Posts |
I don't really understand getting a X4 over a X3. The X4 has the same power, it's less functional, and the more expensive of the two SAVs.
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-28-2014, 12:46 PM | #50 |
Almost completely sane
693
Rep 1,080
Posts |
Thank the gods that looks aren't everything.
__________________
'17 BMW M2 (BSM 6MT Exec CarPlay, TechnicPnP ASD bypass, IND M Perf shift knob + keyhole cover, Pedal Haus pedals + heel plate, 3M CR90 tint, BavSound Ghost woofers, Racing Dynamics strut tower brace, Dinan midpipe, Turner intercooler)
'00 Honda S2000 (Silverstone Metallic, black leather, factory titanium shift knob + front lip + trunk spoiler, front shock tower brace, front subframe x-brace) |
Appreciate
0
|
09-28-2014, 12:58 PM | #51 |
BMW FAN
43
Rep 723
Posts |
BMW should not have made any of these. Back when I was selling BMWs the 5 GT came out and only had a faint interest because it came out before the new 5 series.
BMW, seriously nobody wants these. How are they not reacting to the extremely high day supply? Sounds like Nissan's product plan...and where has that got them? This isn't just because I don't like them. Next thing you know BMW will start making the convertible X4...hmm sounds familiar to the Murano convertible...remember that hunk of sh!t? |
Appreciate
0
|
09-28-2014, 01:05 PM | #52 |
Captain
151
Rep 842
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-28-2014, 09:39 PM | #54 |
Private First Class
4
Rep 140
Posts |
I am holding on to my E61 until BMW N.A. offers something again along the lines of the next gen 5 Series Touring. The X4 and X6 with their slopping roof line makes it the most impractical vehicles. The 5 Series GT has less rear hatch space than my E61 and just looks terrible. The GT3 is very spacious but again is an ugly design.
Listen carefully BMW N.A.,you messed royally when you decided not to offer the F11 in N.A. I don't know who executed your market study but no one wants GT's, the 5 Series GT was a flop and so will the 3 Series GT. As for the X4 and X6, they are useless. I guess BMW just needs to stick the badge on any design and it will sell. This is very unfortunate and quite sad for a company who delivered some of the best sports sedans and wagons on the market. One last thing, if you do decide to offer up a 5 Series Touring again in N.A., can you also please offer a manual gearbox. While I understand the need for 8-speed auto trannies for fuel economy, they make BMW's boring. Again, for the badge lovers this is great, for people who want to drive they are boring and not representative of the BMW brand. They are offered in Europe, just offer them here as well. |
Appreciate
0
|
09-29-2014, 02:46 AM | #56 |
Lieutenant Colonel
1757
Rep 1,705
Posts |
As a 3GT owner, here's my take:
Is a viable segment? Fair question. They don't seem to be selling many. Maybe on that level, some of these models have overestimated their market. Interesting to see whether there will be all new versions in a few years' time. Does it work for some people? Absolutely yes. I would readily concede the f31 is more attractive, but extra cabin and boot space of the f34 makes it more practical for some people. We looked at the f31 and the rear cabin is horribly cramped in comparison. This isn't even a debate - it's just objectively true. 5 series size for not much more than f31 money. Is it ugly? Yawn. You no likey, you no buy. |
Appreciate
0
|
09-29-2014, 08:33 AM | #57 | |
Major General
6243
Rep 6,523
Posts |
Quote:
However, this argument holds no water. Creating these vehicles takes TREMENDOUS resources. Tons of money to create the design, the tooling, the certification, etc., etc. Why continue to spend money on a niche product that will have a low sales volume? That hurts the brand in other areas. Obviously people smarter than me have thought this through, and have concluded that the costs are outweighed by the potential returns. Obviously more sales, even incremental, with a shared platform means that the base tooling, design, etc. can be written off over more units. I learned a long time ago that in Accounting, you can do a lot of interesting things with the numbers. And I'm sure they're playing that game. But at the end of the day, why have so many vheicles that are so clustered around each other? The 3 GT, 4GC, 5 GT and X4 all occupy close to the same space in the market and price wise. No, they are not all the same, bu the 3GT, 4GC and X4 all have almost the same interior. The 3GT and 4GC have very similar exteriors, etc. Spend the money on a completely new direction. Much as I don't like the 2 Active Tourer at least it's a new segment for BMW, one that they're not cannibalizing sales of other BMW's. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-29-2014, 10:28 AM | #58 | |
Captain
151
Rep 842
Posts |
Quote:
I think you have to assume BMW did their sums on development costs, there might not be much in it. But at the end of the day people are buying them, and unless the sales are 100% cannibalisation (which I doubt) then offering the choice is helping to retain customers who would have otherwise gone to Audi, Mercedes et al. for something different. I think the problem is, they are visually challenging.. and many people on many forums use that as an excuse to brand them as pointless or useless - rather then evaluating the relative merits. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-29-2014, 01:51 PM | #60 |
Major General
1272
Rep 6,297
Posts |
I think it is just slightly annoying and visually uncomfortable to see them stand alone. But when all three are together, this is truly disturbing. It is like walking in the back of a used car dealer lot, with all the tradeins and cars waiting to go to service. Nasty.
__________________
997.2
F30.F11.E86.E90.E90.E36 |
Appreciate
0
|
09-29-2014, 02:52 PM | #62 |
Banned
3767
Rep 6,673
Posts |
How did you get all 3 side by side? Was there an "ugly" convention in town that I missed? Good lord! Those are some hideous cars right there. Pontiac Aztec sounds about right.
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-29-2014, 04:01 PM | #63 | |
Private First Class
4
Rep 140
Posts |
Quote:
As much as I like BMW's, BMW NA has been very disappointing of late with their model selections for NA. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-29-2014, 04:35 PM | #64 | |
Lieutenant Colonel
1757
Rep 1,705
Posts |
Quote:
For sure the 3GT is a niche product, and I'm not trying to convince anyone otherwise. I presume you don't think filling a niche is a crime, but that it should fit the brand values and make the company money? On the latter point, I'm pretty sure BMW calculated it would make money. Maybe in the end it won't. But tastes and trends in every market evolve. Sometimes you have to take a punt. If they had ignored the SUV trend, they would have missed out on a ton of business and had less money to reinvest across the range. The brand argument is an interesting one. Yes perhaps if that niche were a damaging departure from BMWs brand values, but is that really the case for the GC and GT models? In the end, to me they are still driver-focused premium products. The active tourer might be a more viable segment, but is a front wheel drive small MPV closer to or further from BMWs core values than the GT or GC? That leaves us with, is it ugly? I'll step out at this point |
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-29-2014, 05:12 PM | #65 |
Major
50
Rep 1,061
Posts |
Most of the people that bash the GT's have never sat in or driven one. Until you do, in comparison to what may be seen as an equivalent X-series vehicle, you don't know what they are talking about!
I prefer a practical vehicle, and the GT, built on the 7-series chassis provides easy access, great long distance poise, and more than adequate performance for most normal people. I don't find it ugly, but then, I care more about how it drives, plus, from the inside, it looks like most BMW's. I can't see the outside while I'm driving it, and could care less what others think about it. Nobody is making you buy one... The 5-series GT, IMHO, got off to a bad start in the USA where it was only available with the V8, no x-drive, and the vast majority of them came in fully loaded making it a nearly $100K car in the USA. The dealers got almost no advertising support, and got stuck with expensive vehicles they couldn't sell. A good portion of them do not stock one, and few have one on their showroom. Some people don't like that extra 3-5" in height, but appreciate the additional height over the sedan. You won't sell many if you don't have any in stock to show people and then let them decide. The GT does sell well elsewhere...people's taste varies - BMW is an international company...they don't only make vehicles for the USA, so how well it does here isn't always a major impact. |
Appreciate
0
|
09-29-2014, 05:26 PM | #66 | |
Captain
151
Rep 842
Posts |
Quote:
And I mean exclusive, like you don't see many... where as you don't go 20m around here without seeing a normal 3/5 saloon/tourer. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|