View Single Post
      10-22-2014, 10:15 AM   #20
david.orr
Lieutenant Colonel
Australia
123
Rep
1,852
Posts

Drives: Cars
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Australia

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by bradleyland
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alex_bm View Post
It's not an M engine. Similar to 1M.
But surely you can see where this harms the perception of the engine in the M2?

"Introducing the M2. Powered by the same N55B30T0 engine found in a compact SAV offering by the same manufacturer."

Might as well put the same engine in a minivan.

Blech I mean, I get it. Bespoke engines are bad for the bottom line. There's a ton of R&D cost that has to be recuperated, but it's really making the M2 look like the bastard child of the M lineup.

The resulting car is going to have to be out of this world, or the press is going to eat it alive. A lot of the same criticisms were levied against the 1M:

"It's a parts bin car."

"It doesn't have a 'real' M-engine."

But when people drove it, those facts took a back seat to the experience. The 1M was/is a hoot to drive. M had better deliver with the M2, because if it is at all soft, toned down, or numb, it's going to get eaten alive in the press and in the minds of buyers.
Agreed. Although 1M does not have a bespoked engine but a retuned N54, the engine is nevertheless unique to the 1M. It seems M2 would share an engine with this ugly X4MP and who knows how many more other mutants?!
Appreciate 0